No Deal is Ideal!

Hi everyone, Brexit may have gone quiet lately in the main stream media, but actually between now and the end of October 2020 will be a crucial. Remain have been defeated in trying to keep us in the EU, their plans for a ‘People’s Vote‘ have been defeated, and they have been defeated in their attempts to extend the transition period. Their last hope is that between now and October our negotiators agree to allow the EU to continue to govern us. Fortunately the EU are making demands so batshit crazy no country could possibly agree to them, but bearing in mind the Tories’ consistent failure to deliver the referendum result we can’t take any chances. We have almost won game set and match, we just need to make sure no deal is reached before November and the Brexit revolution will be complete. To do this it is important we keep circulating the clear, positive, factual arguments for a no deal/WTO Brexit.

Don’t panic! No deal means:
1, We can sign whatever trade deals we like, with whoever we like, whenever we like.
2, Yes, we can still trade with any country in the world.
3, We regain full democratic control over ALL our laws. Right now membership of the Customs Union / Single Market deprives us of democratic control over various laws about goods, services, labour and capital. As the scope of the CU/SM encompassed more and more aspects of our lives, so our democratic control over our society diminished. Leaving the CU/SM will restore full democracy again, which will make us more prosperous.
4, We save money! No £39 billion divorce payment and no £8.6 billion net annual membership fee. The only people that would have to pay anything are the 6% of UK companies that export goods (not services) to the EU. (Incidentally, by ruling out an extension we just saved ourselves circa 80 billion Euros so Brexit is making us more prosperous already!)

Annotation 2020-08-27 154129
5, We can lower tariffs on imports from the poorest farmers in the world, which will (A) make them richer (B) save us money, and (C) reduce inflation.
6, We can do whatever we like to VAT rates without having to ask the EU for permission first.
7, We can still travel wherever we like. (Yes travel did exist before 1973).
8, The national nightmare Remain inflicted on us will finally be over.

EU supporters have developed a curious vocabulary to conceal their love of authoritarianism, they call for ‘harmonisation‘ a ‘level playing field‘ or ‘alignment‘, these phrases are tautological sophistry. The more ‘harmonised‘ our laws are the less democratic control we have over them, ditto ‘level playing field‘ and ‘alignment‘. Conversely EU supporters claim the restoration of democracy will cause ‘friction‘, ‘disruption‘ or ‘isolation‘. But if the ‘friction‘ that comes from having laws we voted for is such a bad thing, why don’t they provide examples of countries that became independent democracies and then declined? The USA didn’t, India didn’t, Canada didn’t, Australia didn’t New Zealand didn’t, Japan didn’t, South Korea didn’t, Switzerland didn’t, Iceland didn’t, Greenland didn’t. All those countries have higher growth and lower unemployment than the Eurozone. Why? Because democracy works. Can I give a list of countries that ceased to be independent democracies and declined? Yes: Germany, France, Italy, Spain, UK, Denmark, Sweden, Holland, etc etc.

Deal means:
1, We can’t sign any trade deals with anyone for years.
2, We still can’t vote for better laws re goods, services, labour or capital.
3, We pay the EU £39 billion for leaving!
4, We have to carry on giving preferential trading terms to 27 predominantly white European nations.
5, Imports from the poorest farmers in the world would still be subject to the Common External Tariff making (A) those farmers poorer (B) us poorer, and (C) our inflation higher.
6, We would have no say over EU laws we would still have to obey.
7, The national nightmare of Remain continues.

Trade negotiations with the EU are not complex, they are simple. All trade negotiations with the EU involve them demanding power over us in exchange for access to their market. But no amount of access to their market could benefit us more than having full democratic control over our own society.

Here is a map I’ve knocked up. Which market should we be concerned about? The big one with high growth or the small one with low growth?

map brexit

We can either:
A, Lock ourselves into the small, low growth EU in which case we will not be a democracy and we will not be able to conduct trade negotiations with other countries. Or…
B, Not lock ourselves into into the EU in which case we can vote for whatever laws we want, and do trade deals with whoever we like.
Its not a tough choice…

The EU are naked, they hold none of the cards. What is the worst thing they could do? Impose tariffs. So what?! This graph shows how tariffs have been in a death spiral for the last 70 years:

download

Besides tariffs are voluntary – people don’t have to pay them because people don’t have to buy this or that product if they don’t want to.

This graph (ONS) shows our trade balance.

Annotation 2020-07-26 224035

It tells us two things:
1, As we became more deeply integrated into the EU project over the last 40 years, our trade balance declined more and more.
2, Since leaving we have seen the biggest improvement of our trade balance in history.

Before we joined the CU/SM we had balanced trade (equal imports and exports) but since we joined that has turned into a £95 billion deficit (which is higher per head than the US trade deficit with China). Membership of the CU/SM has devastated our economy.

Conclusion
-The phrase ‘no deal’ is misleading because it implies that if we left the EU without reaching an agreement no political or trading system would exist. But actually ‘no deal’ would simply mean that the UK would trade under standard WTO rules.
-The EU and the UK are already full members of the WTO and trade under its terms every day.
-WTO rules give us full access to the EU’s single market. Access does not require membership. It would be illegal for the EU to restrict our access to the Single Market.
-90 per cent of world trade is done on WTO terms.
-60 per cent (and rising) of our trade with other countries is done on WTO terms.
-Our exports to the countries we trade with on WTO terms have grown three times as fast as our exports to the EUs Single Market.
-Our businesses trade with the USA on WTO terms and we have a trade surplus with the USA.
-Our businesses trade with the EU on it’s Single Market terms and we have a trade deficit with the EU.
-The average tariff British exporters would pay is 4 per cent. But applying EU tariffs to our imports from EU countries would yield £13 billion which we could use to compensate any firm losing out.
-The French authorities in Calais have no intention of imposing a go-slow on British vehicles, rightly calling it ‘economic suicide’. Besides deliberate delays would breach three treaties: the WTO treaty, the Trade Facilitation Agreement and the Lisbon Treaty, which require the EU to behave in a neighbourly way towards adjacent states. Do EU supporters really think the EU would use illegal bullying to punish us? If so, how can they urge us to re-join?
-Robert Azevedo, the WTO’s director general, says that Britain’s leaving the EU will be ‘relatively straightforward’ and ‘smooth’: “The UK is a member of the WTO today, it will continue to be a member tomorrow. There will be no discontinuity in membership. … Trade will not stop, it will continue as members negotiate the legal basis under which that trade is going to happen. But it doesn’t mean that we’ll have a vacuum or a ‘disruption’ in terms of trade flows or anything of the kind …

Please circulate these facts and take a couple of minutes to write to your MP and politely urge them to push for a WTO Brexit. Thanks.

by S.Handley and W.Podmore

10 thoughts on “No Deal is Ideal!

  1. That’s brilliant I know of no one who wanted a deal it’s always been about leaving this article just confirms my thoughts on leaving.

    Thanks

    Keith

    Like

    1. Thanks for your comment. The EU offers preferential trading terms for 27 predominantly white European nations whilst using its Common External Tariff to shut African farmers out of its market. After having been accused of racism for several years I’m going to carry on pointing out which side really are the far right.

      Like

      1. Fair comment – I didn’t read beyond a seeming disparaging anti-white comment.

        I believe in fair play and fair trade, and most certainly do not approve of the EU’s protectionist behaviour – and anti democratic ways.

        As an aside, being on the right’ doesn’t automatically equate with being racist in my experience. That issue usually lies with extremists at both ends of the political spectrum. For instance there are noisome far left groups that are screamingly anti white. Racism against any racial group is a bad thing.

        Like

  2. The UK economy is structurally and regionally imbalanced and has been for decades. It’s also poor and struggling to make ends meet once you get outside London. If we were to take away the welfare state then the reality would really hit home and we would then see what the real economy is delivering in these areas in terms of prosperity. If the UK was a medical patient it would be time to put us in intensive care. And if that’s whats needed you don’t want to worry that some EU court might sue if the doctors and nurses aren’t giving other patients the same amount of time and focus. The last thing we need is to have our hands tied by state aid and level playing field rules which might only serve to make any recovery less likely.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s